Are You An Ambivert Personality?



Introvert or Extravert. Some people feel like they just aren’t one or the other. They don’t see themselves as that boring, or that simple. This feeling of being caught between introversion and extraversion is also known as the Ambivert Personality.

Maybe, they love being with their friends, talking, going out to eat, seeing shows, and trying new things. What if they also love staying home, hibernating, losing themselves in a book or a game, ignoring their phone (and their Facebook feed), and being gloriously alone.

It can be really frustrating trying to reconcile a sense of complexity with the Myers-Briggs typing system, when it feels like it’s putting them in a straight jacket.

It might seem flawed and incomplete, and like it’s forcing them into a tiny box that just doesn’t allow for all the nuances of who they really are.

Most articles on this subject would pick a side: “Ambiverts exist!” Or “No. There is no such thing.” Funny enough (I do like a good contradiction ;)), we’re here to say… both.

It might surprise you for a hardcore personality type nerd, like me, to say this, but: Myers-Briggs letter system (You’re either I or E, F or T, etc.) is overly simple. ¨All it takes is four letters to wrap up your whole personality in a nice neat bow!¨

What Came Before Myers-Briggs?

PersonalityHacker_Jung_Before-it-was-coolA lot of people don’t know that Myers-Briggs is actually a mainstream version of something more complex: Carl Jung’s work, Psychological Types.

Carl Jung was a contemporary of Freud, and his work had an enormous impact on modern psychology, among other things. (Fun fact: he was played by Michael Fassbender in the 2011 film A Dangerous Method.)

The Myers-Briggs system was intended to help decode his more nuanced, but somewhat more complicated, explanations. They  (Isabel Briggs Myers, and her mother, Katharine Briggs) wanted to make it easier to understand and more useful to people, in general.

And in some ways it really worked.

It’s easy to see how well-known this concept of a 4-letter type is (ISFJ, ENTP, etc.), especially compared with Jung’s concept of cognitive functions.

While the 4-letter type can be kind of a name, meant to describe a personality type as a whole, cognitive functions describe individual mental processes.

So, rather than treating a personality as one solid chunk, it looks more finely at the pieces that make it up. (Myers-Briggs does this, but in a much more general way).

How Do Cognitive Functions Influence the Ambivert Personality?

According to Jung, each cognitive function individually is Introverted or Extraverted. So, for example, instead of just Feeling and Thinking (F, T), which is what Myers-Briggs uses, there is Introverted Feeling and Extraverted Feeling; Introverted Thinking and Extraverted Thinking (Fi, Fe, Ti, Te).

Along with those 4 decision-making functions, there are 4 learning functions: Introverted Intuition, Extraverted Intuition, Introverted Sensing, and Extraverted Sensing (Ni, Ne, Si, Se).

Each personality type focuses on four functions.
personality-hacker_car-model-cognitive-stackWe like to use the car model to illustrate how this works. You have 2 functions in the front of the car, one Introverted and one Extraverted, (and 2 in the back, one of each as well).

Basically, someone being an Introvert or an Extravert, only says which one is driving the car.

The order of the functions, which one is in which seat, is what makes one personality type different from another. People like to think of the order in different ways. Some understand it with the idea of preferences, similar to what kind of ice cream is your favorite.

But, that brings up the idea, again, of having to choose one over the other, or like one over the other.

What if you don’t want to pick just one?

What if you like both chocolate and vanilla?

Wolf Pack Mentality

For me, a better way to think of it is like your personality is a pack of wolves.

Wolves have a hierarchy; a pecking order. There’s always a top dog. They all have a place in the pack, though.

The Alpha wolf is the leader, but it’s not the only one that matters. A good leader looks out for the others, helps them, supervises them, and also allows them to use their abilities so they can all work together to care for the group. Everyone is useful.

So, saying you are an Introvert or Extrovert is only describing the function you drive or lead with. You have both, though. You need both.

In fact, the more you grow, the more you will seem like an “Ambivert.”

It’s healthy having development in both your inner and outer worlds. To be well-rounded, balanced, and whole we need access and relationships to both. We’re better off if we have the ability to be both Introverted and Extraverted.

Here’s a real life example: Joel, is an ENFP. Going back to the car model, he has an Extroverted driver function. We call it Exploration, but it’s also known as Extraverted Intuition (or Ne). He uses it to look for patterns in the outside world.

Joel’s copilot function, in the front passenger seat, is Authenticity (aka Introverted Feeling or Fi). It is about core values, what he finds to be important, how he feels personally, his personal identity, his personal intentions.

Whatever Joel is doing, wherever he is, he’s mostly going to be using those things to make his way in the world. If he’s in an Extraverted situation, like a party, he will probably use more of his Exploration. If he’s in a quiet situation, like reflecting or journaling, he may use more of his Introverted part, Authenticity.

Joel has noticed that he used to be typically recognized by others as an Extravert, but lately people have, on first impression, seen him as being more Introverted.

His Introverted copilot is the part of himself that he’s working on developing. So, he is still technically an Extravert, but he is developing a more nuanced version of himself, one that uses more of a balance of both Introversion and Extraversion.

How are Introversion and Extraversion Misunderstood?

Some misunderstandings of Introversion and Extraversion seem to come from the idea that they are about being social or not. But, this isn’t always the case.

BHAGSome Extraverted functions aren’t necessarily social. Sensation, our nickname for Extraverted Sensing (or Se), has a lot to do with outer world experiences, action, and also aesthetics. Physical action or sensory activity can involve other people, since they are part of the outside world, but it doesn’t need to. Working out, drawing, or cooking are all activities that can engage Sensation, but don’t require other people.

Similarly Memory, Introverted Sensing (or Si), doesn’t always mean being away from people. It has a lot to do with physical comfort, relaxation, and safety. Also, familiarity, habit, and nostalgia. Getting a massage, remembering old times, or carrying on a tradition are all things that can engage Memory, but could easily involve other people a great deal.

It’s really about where each process is directed. Sensation is more attentive to outward stimulation, while Memory is attentive to more internal and subjective experiences.

We often say things like, “I am an Introvert” or “She is an Extravert.” Regardless of the implications of this kind of language, being an Introvert or an Extravert is not your identity.

The Road is Not the Map

Your personality type is not your identity. It’s just a map. Like other maps, it’s purpose is to simplify the picture so you can get a better idea of where you are and where you can go. They help you see what the area looks like and what obstacles you might have to deal with.

map-is-not-the-territoryThere is so much more to you than one system or description. Don’t mistake your identity for some 4 letter code, or even your functions. It’s just a starting place to understanding the skeleton of your mind. It’s part of your mental structure, and some of the pieces of it, but there’s a lot more to you than your bones.

Sometimes people find a flaw and want to throw out the whole system, but honestly that’s an overreaction.

A map doesn’t have to have every detail and every piece of information in existence to be useful. No map includes every detail of the real life version.

If someone tells you that a map of Disneyland is actually a photograph of Disneyland, you’re going to have different expectations for it. You’re going to notice that details are missing.

Using a map as though it’s a literal representation of the real thing might be unreliable, and it will probably be frustrating. That doesn’t make the map any less useful, if you realize what it really is and use it properly.

There are different kinds of maps (topographical maps, road maps), and there are big and small maps (world maps, state maps, city maps, neighborhood maps).

That’s why we’re interested in a lot of different systems and models for understanding how we work, and for personal growth. We talk about the Graves Model, Maslow’s Heirarchy of Needs, the Enneagram, etc.

Personality type is just one system. If you’re looking for something that’s not on one map, or you want a bigger view, or maybe a closer look, you might be able to find it on a different map.

-Jenna DeNardo

Want to learn more?

Discover Your Personal Genius


Showing 5 comments
  • Andrea F

    I always think of it as being on a scale you’re not actually one but usually tend to lean more one way

  • Nikki

    I know this is an old post, but I’m just starting to dig in on this site… This article is so helpful as a shy extravert married (not 100% on my type, likely ENFP or ENTP) to an outgoing introvert (ISTJ). People think we’re the opposite because most don’t understand the distinction.

  • Nicko

    Don’t you wish you were able to coach the guy on the spot and give him a few pointers lol?And by the way, did that even cross your mind to try motoin to the guy or anything? Probably not, but 1 of these days, I might do that actually. Whenever I see a guy visibly being weird like a smirk and stuff, I might actually go over there, introduce myself and as covertly as possible, tell the guy what he’s doing that is obvious turnoff to the girl.

  • Eric B

    Introversion and extroversion originally were linked to classic temperament (the old four “humors” of Hippocrates and Galen. Galen called the factor “hot vs cold” ). Another term used for this is “expressiveness”.
    You could conceivably be “ambiverted” meaning inbetween in expressiveness. I know of versions of classic temperament theory which use graded scales, and it makes the categories less rigid.

    In neurology, I/E is connected with the ego’s stimulateability (a high level will tend to want less, and then withdraw inward, while a low level will seek more, and then be drawn outward more, and this becomes the basis of I and E). It is likely that this inward or outward drawing is what will also direct where we turn our dominant function. (And from there, the other functions and attitudes fall into place).

    Since the actual inward vs outward “turning” of the dominant (“driver”) is a hard “either/or”, then this is why it is such an absolute polarity in type. However, the actual level of “expressiveness” that accompanies this may vary. So the person may say they are an “ambivert”. And in one sense they are, yet, there will still be a preference, however slight, for an inner or outer focus, and that’s what will determine I or E for type.

    • Jenna DeNardo

      I remember reading about Galen’s classifications, among others, in one of Keirsey’s books (Please Understand Me II).

      Thanks for sharing that neurological connection. That’s really interesting and makes a lot of sense, to me. I have often wondered if some initial disambiguation (maybe not quite the right word..) might force the other preferences. 🙂

      Thanks for commenting. Nicely (and concisely) expressed.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Contact Us

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Not readable? Change text. captcha txt