chess

First see “How Your Mind Makes Decisions”

Introverted Thinking (or what we’ve nicknamed Accuracy) is the part of us that asks, “Does this make sense?” When data is incongruent or when it doesn’t add up, you’re using Accuracy to sort it out. When you make a decision based upon consistent, solid facts, you’re using Accuracy as decision-making criteria.

Examples:

“It doesn’t really matter if it’s my boss, he was totally incorrect in his assertion that receiving co-paid insurance should ingratiate us to this company and as a way to ‘pay back’ we should volunteer for overtime. It doesn’t matter if our performance will be graded upon it. I’m not going to volunteer, and I’ll defend my position in my next interview. Status doesn’t justify manipulating facts or people.”

“Happiness is a noble human endeavor, but the way to happiness is mostly systemic. If you create the conditions of happiness, then it will be the natural emergent property. We should look at the components of happiness starting with the ‘nodes’ in the system, the largest influencers, alter to them to ideal conditions and see if happiness emerges.”

Accuracy-driven people are far more driven by facts than people. In fact, sometimes other people seem like data points to an Accuracy user, though they aren’t necessary cold-hearted. Seeking Truth is the ultimate virtue, but Truth is subjective (as any Accuracy person will tell you). That means sorting through a lot of ideally unpolluted data to see as clear a picture as possible. People’s emotions are sticky – definitely not ‘unpolluted’. So, when it comes decision time everyone’s emotions take a back seat.

At best, Accuracy tells truth without judgment. It’s not trying to determine what’s good or bad, just what makes sense. If you’re mistaken and an Accuracy person corrects you, it’s not personal. They honestly would want that information themselves and so they expect you want it, too. Some of the clearest thinkers of the past have been Accuracy driven – Einstein, among them. The concept of “Radical Honesty” is most assuredly an Accuracy person’s project. When we tell each other the truth without judgment, we don’t have to hide from ourselves or our insecurities any more. We face life as it is fully and work with what we’ve got, not with what we wish we had. We also master the secrets of the universe through careful, uncorrupted study. This leads to knowledge that blows us away, and helps us gain perspective through these amazing journeys of science and discovery.

At their worst, an Accuracy person is a know-it-all, cavalierly questioning every conclusion they did not personally come to in order to prove the superiority of their ‘information’. Since they don’t have other people’s emotions on their radar, they can be socially crass and inconsiderate, sometimes down-right hurtful. Masters of data and information, they can see themselves as not benefiting from other people’s information any longer and so zoom too far in on what they already know instead of gathering new, imperative data. They pollute their information, not by introducing sticky elements, but by completely ignoring relevant details.

In order to make the best decisions, Accuracy people should remember a couple of things. First, being open-minded is the quickest path to Truth, whatever that ends up meaning. Dismissing others for being less ‘rational’ than you is a pretty irrational way of culling data. Anyone, anywhere, anytime can teach you grand truths, and so keep your antennae on alert. To do the opposite only makes you what you hate the most – ignorant.

Second, be careful not to ignore the importance of context when studying content. True, sometimes context can get in the way of a train of thought. But information is always part of a bigger spider web of connected ideas and theories, so make sure you’ve at least taken that into consideration before you study just a few strands. Don’t mistake mastery for accuracy.

Accuracy people tend to have a blind spot in Harmony.

Want to learn more?

Discover Your Personal Genius

free-personality-test-myers-briggs-300x72

We want to hear from you. Leave your comments below…

20 comments

  • Womanofcolor
    • Womanofcolor
    • February 22, 2018 at 2:56 pm

    Hello,

    Infj here. Correct me if I am misunderstanding, but I respectfully disagree with the idea of staying open-minded to other people’s views or not dismissing them as irrational. This advice may be excellent for those who think they know everything and those who refuse to listen to others. Here’s my take on it, as a brown-skinned infj woman with a trauma history.

    From an infj people pleaser’s point of view, one of the biggest mistakes in my life was choosing to adopt other people’s opinions and taking their bad advice. I only went along with what people wanted me to do, because I felt obligated to please them and to maintain social harmony. Since I have a trauma history, I had a tendency to second-guess myself and not realize that my opinion mattered just as much as the other person. Once I chose to go along with someone else’s flawed perspective, I had to pay the price. When people push their poor advice and poor opinions on you, they don’t have to deal with the negative consequences. I could have avoided a lot of negative situations, IF I stayed true to what I thought and wanted. For infjs who have been involved with narcissists, you all know what it’s like to be manipulated into doing things that you don’t want to do.

    One important life lesson for me is to trust my judgment, regardless of what people say. Considering that most of the advice I have received in life was inaccurate and unhelpful, I am happpier evaluating other people’s opinions before I can accept it as truth. It’s ironic that I have gotten more positive results by listening to my introverted intuition, instead of doing what others want me to do. Since my happiness is my responsibility, I can’t aftord to pay the price of listening to someone else who doesn’t know what they’re talking about.

    Don’t get me wrong. I can appreciate a different perspective, as long as it’s insightful and well-thought out. The best advice I have received in life came from those who understood trauma and people of color, and those who knew how to listen to the facts of what I am saying.

    I am polite and respectful to everybody, but I still will mentally reject and discard what someone says if it’s not accurate.

    Thanks for your article.

  • Vanesa
    • Vanesa
    • June 10, 2017 at 1:40 pm

    I agree with you both. That is the only thing in the article that “bothered” me :-)

  • Sara
    • Sara
    • January 11, 2017 at 11:53 am

    I am an INTP also and I reacted in pretty much the same way when I read that sentence. It bothers me when people say the truth is subjective because it’s not, it people’s different views on things that make it seem that.

  • Matthew Logan
    • Matthew Logan
    • December 7, 2016 at 3:55 pm

    IMHO, truth is not subjective, but Truth is subjective.
    One is what is, and the other is what we perceive.
    All truth can only be experienced through a subjective veil, so we we speak about truth as a theory, it is not subjective, but when we speak about truth in practice, it is always subjective.

  • Matt Logan
    • Matt Logan
    • December 7, 2016 at 3:49 pm

    Authenticity is feeling-based. Accuracy is thinking-based.
    Based on my admittedly-limited knowledge about this, it seems that
    Authenticity focuses on personal truth, or being true to yourself and your feelings,
    vs
    Accuracy, which focuses on universal truth, or being true to the universe and its data.
    Anyone have any other thoughts?

Leave a comment

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.