Podcast - Episode 0390 - What Kind Of Thinking Can Be Trusted

In this podcast you’ll find:

• How do you know whether you can trust someone’s thinking or not? Antonia explains the rationale behind this question.
• What are some metrics you can use to measure trustworthy thought?
  • Examining the quality of thoughts
  • When people don’t realize thoughts are contextual
• Looking at thinking through a cause and effect versus a systems approach.
  • How the systems-thinking approach works over time
  • How this shows up for Antonia in her approach to business partnerships
• What makes Antonia distrust someone’s thinking?
  • The idea that a “corrupt node” can follow a person around
• Contextual trust: the distinction between trusting someone’s thinking versus holistically trusting them as an individual.
• What are the areas where Antonia trusts Joel’s quality of thinking? Where doesn’t she trust his thinking and why?
• What areas does Antonia trust her own thinking in, and what prevents her from always trusting her own thoughts?
• Intellectual honesty and how this relates to ego work in the type community:
  • Examining the desire to call out people we believe are mistyped
  • How could we shift this towards a healthier, more growth focused direction?
  • Humility versus hubris – giving people the space they need to change their mind
• A message to feelers listening to this conversation.
• The effect of only “judging based on agreement” – using Black Jeopardy! as an illustration.