Download Episode Here – right click link and select “Save Link As…”
In this episode of the Personality Hacker podcast, Joel and Antonia explore the 4 work styles that influence INFP careers.
Discover more about subtypes in Dr. Dario Nardi’s “The 64 Subtypes in Depth”
————————————————
In this podcast you’ll find:
- Why are Joel and Antonia discussing careers for each of the personality types?
- What are some popular career choices for INFPs?
-
Introducing the INFP subtypes by Dr. Dario Nardi.
- How to approach the concept of the four subtypes.
- Check out our previous podcast episode where Dario introduces the four subtypes of each personality type.
- The energy and flavor of the four subtypes.
-
The four INFP subtypes:
- Dominant subtype – how these INFPs utilize their strong personalities.
- Creative subtype – how these INFPs thrive through their playfulness and imagination.
- Normalizing subtype – how these INFPs develop specializations through their work.
- Harmonizing subtypes – how these INFPs utilize their understanding of the human condition.
- What’s the relationship between our career and our subtype?
- The potential for your career path as an INFP.
To subscribe to the podcast, please use the links below:
Subscribe with iTunes
Non-iTunes Link
Soundcloud
Stitcher
Google Play
Spotify
Radio Public
PlayerFM
Listen Notes
If you like the podcast and want to help us out in return, please leave an honest rating and review on iTunes by clicking here. It will help the show and its ranking in iTunes immensely! We would be eternally grateful!
Want to learn more?
Discover Your Personal Genius
We want to hear from you. Leave your comments below…
Share:
ENTP Careers - 4 Work Styles Of The Personality Type | Podcast 0483
ISFJ Careers - 4 Work Styles Of The Personality Type | Podcast 0485
13 comments
Librarian discussion was funny… LOL An INTJ here, so just for your information: https://www.ala.org/educationcareers/libcareers/become
I think people get confused with analytical does not mean you want everything to be fact I am a normalizing INFP and i agree with what you are saying but i think its because we need to see whats round the corner. Creativity is everything and anything so to just isolate it what does it mean. Also if you compare everything said to how you feel they will always be contradictions watch other people and you might learn you actually are patient and probably a lot of things you think your bad at is only because you have a desire to do a lot better as a person.
It looks quite obvious to me that we are all these subtypes through my life i am all of these no question about it.
Yeah and trying to do simple things like opening stuff up i struggle the so called easy stuff . So far i would say you are spot on with everything you are saying. I am a normalizing INFP and i love research and as long as its a challenge the less people know about it the better. Visualisation lol is one of my best attributes when i take the British intelligent test i am in the top 5 percent i think that mainly is if you had been playing sport as a child to be honest it could be because i am sure we get overly nervous in front of others when asked to do stuff in front of others.
I loved the humorous back and forth between Joel and Antonia about librarian careers. Transparent fallibility is one of my favorite character traits. :)
Thanks to everyone who has posted, I have read all your comments with interest.
I think the biggest thing that deterred me from ID-ing as ‘normalizing’ INFP was the word ‘calm’ – I’ve done my fair share of over-dramatizing things! But I also contain the contradiction of being both an organisation-freak and someone with impatience to do something creative, exploratory or random. This isn’t simply about wanting to transition from one corner of ordered sane-ness and sobriety to the opposite end, it’s like I need to be both, just not at the same time. The end result is someone who struggles to concentrate doing boring repetitive tasks but who also struggles with truly freed-up creative thought, though I have been developing this muscle. I’m still very analytical and think I value that too much to really let go and properly drift off into woo-woo land.
I think all this (and other contradictions I could have mentioned) might be better represented by normalising ENFP, not that I know that much about it but no one really does as the sample size studied would have been small and likely not a scientifically balanced cross-section.
(Sorry if I’m blabbering-on I just don’t normally get the chance to express myself in this manner).