Download Episode Here – right click link and select “Save Link As…”
In this episode, Joel and Antonia talk about why we tend to avoid developing our co-pilot cognitive function in our Myers-Briggs personality.
In this podcast you’ll find:
- Car Model article
- Last week’s podcast on the Car Model
- Cognitive Function stack
- Introverted and Extraverted functions
- Learning (Perceiving) and decision-making (Judging) functions
- Driver/dominant function is our favorite
- Co-Pilot tends to be two dimensional because we do not explore it as thoroughly as our Driver
- Circumstances or careers may contribute to the development of the Co-Pilot
- We adopt strategies that work for us, and when we try something new – like developing the Co-Pilot – it may feel exhausting and pointless.
- We may choose to stick with the familiar.
-
Stephen Covey’s Competency model:
- Unconscious Incompetence
- Conscious Incompetence
- Conscious Competence
- Unconscious Competence
- The only way out is through
- It is worth it to gain competence with our Co-Pilot, even if it is painful to begin with.
- Massive shifts may be on the horizon
- You may initially reject some of our suggestions for developing your Co-Pilot process
- Our Mind can resist growth if it fears the consequences that may come with that growth
- Development of the auxiliary function gets us to the life we want
- We may have created a synthetic life for ourselves up until now.
- The Co-Pilot is the opposite attitude of our Driver
- If your Driver is Extraverted, your Co-Pilot will be Introverted – and vice versa
-
EJs – ESFJ, ESTJ, ENTJ, ENFJ
- All lead with an Extraverted evaluative function, so their Co-Pilot is going to be Introverted perceiving
- All EJs want to be in control. Managing the situation.
- When EJs go into their Co-Pilot, they have to slow down and face a world they may not be able to control.
- ESJs Co-Pilot is Introverted Sensing, which requires a longer timeline – the past
- ENJs Co-Pilot is Introverted Intuition, which requires a longer timeline – the future
- It requires calm, presence, and isolation.
- EJs love closing loops
- EFJs close loops with people
- ETJs close loops with systems
- Getting in touch with the inner world means walking away and not closing loops.
- There may even be some legit healing work that needs to happen, so the inner world feels like a mess.
- If there are inner issues, you may be closing loops that don’t resonate with you fundamentally.
- Going inside helps you get on the right trajectory.
-
EPs – ENFP, ESFP, ENTP, ESTP
- All lead with an Extraverted perceiving process, so their Co-Pilot is going to be an Introverted judging process
- EPs love speed and freedom
- Slowing down for EPs prevents them from quickly pivoting, which feels like it is removing their freedom or identity
- EPs may not know what their identity even is, so they go inside and have to start getting to know themselves.
- Ethics and moral codes are often found within
- It’s much better to have freedoms removed due to integrity than guilt
- EJs and EPs must – Slow. Way. Down.
- Sit with yourself. Journal. Meditate. Ruminate. Get present with yourself.
- Be willing to sit with a lot of pain.
- Learn the skill to work with your pain and build intimacy with yourself
- It is worth it.
-
IJs – INTJ, ISTJ, INFJ, ISFJ
- All lead with an Introverted perceiving process, so their Co-Pilot is going to be an Extraverted judging process
- When you lead with an Introverted perceiving process, you get to a place where you realize that the outer world is scary.
- On some level, all info IJs pick up gets trapped inside – it’s an Introverted perceiving process.
- All IJs know the outside world has dangers to it.
- Sometimes they don’t get to decide what comes in unless they build some firm boundaries against it.
- To explore the Extraverted world feels like a scary, vulnerable place to IJs.
- Real world feedback can be scary.
- IJs need to execute ideas in the outer world.
- Through systems or relationships.
- It’s like sticking your neck out because you don’t know the response you’re going to get.
- There is a significant difference between conceptualizing impact on the world and actually impacting the world.
- The more Introverts do Extraverted behaviors, the faster they get at processing the feedback.
- You are going to fail. That’s part of learning.
- IJs love to learn. It is very gratifying. But they are used to doing it in controlled environments.
- The learning IJs do from getting into action has 10x the return.
- The only way to get into harmony is by resolving conflict
- If an ITJ is trying to build something they may have to start with breaking it.
- The core fear of IJs is vulnerability
- Test. Get feedback. Improve. Test again.
- Get used to the process.
- Become less vulnerable through skill building.
-
IPs – INTP, INFP, ISTP, ISFP
- All lead with an Introverted judging process, so their Co-Pilot is going to be an Extraverted perceiving process.
- IPs know their core identity – what makes sense.
- They enjoy comfort
- Asking IPs to get into their Co-Pilot requires destabilizing action that may contradict how they see themselves and the world.
- Avoiding their Co-Pilot allows the IP to keep their core identity protected.
- Getting out into the world exposes the IP to criticism.
- Identity level shifts are painful.
- It can take a long time for IPs to revisit their identity.
- The core fear is self-doubt
- Unless you have been lucky enough to be pushed into a life that favors your Co-Pilot, it is going to be hard to develop.
- Our Co-Pilot can help us focus on our passion, purpose, and mission
- We focus 80% of our content at PH on developing the Co-Pilot – the single most important part of our personality.
- You will be happier and have better relationships if you develop your Co-Pilot
- All of our cognitive functions are important and require some attention, but once you start focusing on the Co-Pilot everything else falls into place.
- You can’t develop your Co-Pilot enough
To subscribe to the podcast, please use the links below:
Subscribe with iTunes
Non-iTunes Link
Download The Android App
Subscribe on Soundcloud
Subscribe with Stitcher
Subscribe on Google Play
Subscribe with Facebook Messenger
If you like the podcast and want to help us out in return, please leave an honest rating and review on iTunes by clicking here. It will help the show and its ranking in iTunes immensely! We would be eternally grateful!
Want to learn more?
Discover Your Personal Genius
We want to hear from you. Leave your comments below…
Share:
Podcast - Episode 0225 - The Car Model (Your Personality Cognitive Function Stack)
Podcast - Episode 0227 - Developing Intuition As A Co-Pilot (INxP & ENxJ Types)
27 comments
Umm a suggestion and an example for ur next podcast, Being an Infp, who has had a blooming Fi but who v recently has started developing his Ne i get what ur talking abt but cld u give specific egs of how to do this and also specific egs of things which can make this developing the co-pilot easier with lets say a transition from the Fi to Ne bcs ur already good with the Fi , my eg is of my best friend, a person who i met 2 years ago, now my relationship which as u know infps highly value is Fi, but bcs that friend is an Extrovert, Enfp, keeping up with him or meeting up or spending time together has meant that Ive had to open up and experience new things in the process which is Ne, but the I didnt open up or experiece new things bcs i wanted to develop the Ne, i did them all bcs of my Fi, my love for that person .. hope u get what Im saying here. :)
ok, this podcast was incredibly helpful. i was conceptualizing about how to use Ne, as you two mentioned, thinking I could expand it by reading more and doing more research, but now I see how it requires much more experimentation in conversation, in action, in learning things for myself instead of outsourcing my problem-solving. I’m seeing more ways of negotiating w myself and that which is outside of me. Also. In an earlier podcast, Antonia mentioned a possible way of getting into Ne is by wasting resources without knowing why you’re wasting them, and that idea combined w some of the advice in this podcast seem to be paradigm-shifting. Thank you so much for this piece of art.
The thing that has been resonating with me from the podcast is that people will try to shoehorn activities that suit their driver into a definition that fits developing their co-pilot. I didn’t realize that this was what I was doing. I’m INTJ, and I love checking items off lists. One of the ways this has always expressed in my life is binging on content—once I discover an author or podcaster that I like, I will consume everything that they have produced. So I will watch all of the YouTube videos from particular creators, and it’s checking things off my list, but doing so in a way that doesn’t involve getting any external feedback or exposing myself to the world in any way. So it’s a Te itch, but one that doesn’t give me any of benefits of developing my co-pilot.
I have a question about an activity I’ve been doing for the last several years now. It’s singing with others. Would that be an Fe thing? I’m considered the group “leader” (I don’t, I just take care of admin, comms, etc.). What else – if this isn’t an Fe aux thing – could I do to make this so,or some other activity like it?
Hi,
Around 12:40 you talk about Aux function being authentic versus synthetic. I"m at a point where I feel that not only is that true, but also what I feel to be true for me right now, and feel that’s where I want to be/go. Not quite the words I wanted to use but whatever. I’m writing right after my “poof” (what others call “aha”) thing.